Author Topic: Shaft vs Bike Age  (Read 464 times)

Offline firebane

  • Posts: 447
  • braaaaaaaaaaap
Shaft vs Bike Age
« on: Apr 27, 2018, 19:06:31 »
We all know that shaft bikes have a higher percentage of power train loss compared to those with a chain.

If you were looking at an older bike say mid 70s to late 80s would you be more inclined to go with a chain over a shaft? Would it be more to do with the CCs of the bike?

Or would you just find whatever and ride? As an example a 1982 Yamaha Seca 750 (shaft) or a 1982 Kawasaki KZ550.

Online Rat_ranger

  • *
  • Posts: 360
Re: Shaft vs Bike Age
« Reply #1 on: Apr 27, 2018, 23:06:10 »
Depends on your end goal for the bike.  Chain is easier to swap wheels, lift or lower the rear, extend the rear etc.  Shaft is nice for the reduced maintenance.

Offline Tim

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 12913
    • DO THE TON
Re: Shaft vs Bike Age
« Reply #2 on: Apr 27, 2018, 23:32:51 »
Find whatever and ride.
"Quality . . . you know what it is, yet you don't know what it is. But that's self-contradictory. But some things are better than others, that is, they have more quality. But when you try to say what the quality is, apart from the things that have it, it all goes poof! There's nothing to talk about. But if you can't say what Quality is, how do you know what it is, or how do you know that it even exists? If no one knows what it is, then for all practical purposes it doesn't exist at all. But for all practical purposes it really does exist."

Offline hillsy

  • Posts: 4117
Re: Shaft vs Bike Age
« Reply #3 on: Apr 28, 2018, 01:48:02 »
The Seca 750 was a really capable bike and on the street would outperform most of the other 750s of the day. Unfortunately Yamaha hit it with the ugly stick and it never got the credit it deserved.

But yeah - if you want to cut one up and swap wheels it's harder with a shaft drive bike. But they are cheaper  8)