collapse

www.dimecitycycles.com


www.restocycle.com

www.CITYLIMITMOTO.com

www.jadusmotorcycleparts.com

www.bisonmotorsports.com

www.speedmotoco.com

www.cognitomoto.com

www.townmoto.com

www.sparckmoto.com

www.Moto-Madness.com

www.pistonsociety.com

www.steeltowngarage.com

GET DTT UPDATES ON FACEBOOK AND TWITTER

Author Topic: My Suzi T500 Project *New Video*  (Read 188587 times)

Offline teazer

  • DTT SUPPORTER
  • *
  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 8206
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #40 on: Dec 22, 2010, 12:40:29 »
Johnu,  That was the point.  With different forks and swingarm my 28/29 degree GT750 was sitting at around 22 degrees  with the swingarm where I want it and that isn't going to work too well.

I'd suggest you bolt on teh forks and front wheel and slip in the swingarm and rear wheel and then start to raise the center on the frame to get the rear end geometry you are looking for and measure the front end. I suspect you will find that you can reach or pass that objective without cutting the front end of the frame.

Plus the front wheel goes from 19 inches to 17 inches so teh front is much lower and if the forks are shorter the front end will be lower again. Just going 19 to 19 with a one inch drop in teh front end and one inch added at the rear took a stock Gt750 too steep.

BTW, 24 is pretty steep for a bike with a relatively bendy frame.  If it comes out to say 5-8 degrees static swingarm droop and say 24-26 degrees of rake it should work, but measure twice and cut once as they say.
« Last Edit: Dec 22, 2010, 12:42:37 by teazer »

Offline 50gary

  • Posts: 585
  • Under the Limelight
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #41 on: Dec 22, 2010, 14:10:35 »
I like the 24 degree rake simply because that's the sportbike norm.  The design goal (as I understand it) is to achieve as close to sportbike properties in a tube frame as reasonably possible.  Many T500 race guys shorten the standard swingarm to help quicken the steering by making the wheelbase shorter.  I think this is backwards to modern thinking, swingarms are now longer and steering head angles steeper. the current thinking is to load the front more if I understand correctly?  I did a similar project and had very good results.  Plus the challenge is a big part of any project.    Two cents.
  Cheers, 50gary
Short track speedskating, cycling, guitars, motorcycles, juggling dynamite. I was born to laugh at Tornadoes.

Offline johnu

  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #42 on: Dec 22, 2010, 14:12:10 »
Teaser, good call.  I have just been playing around with an autocad drawing of the frame, swingarm, forks and 17" wheels and it appears as you say that I may not need to remove the headstock.  I don't really like the fact (asthetically) that the engine and chassis rails will be canted by 5* though.  However I do like that the rear would be a bit higher with the seat unit angling upward slightly.  I'll take your suggestion to bolt up the parts and see what can be achieved and how it looks before cutting anything.  My first priority is to get the swingarm pivot brackets tacked in place so that I can do the mock up.  If I end up going down the route of not cutting and replacing the headstock I will have to source bearings that both fit the 636 forks and the original headstock, any ideas where I could look for these?

All suggestion are greatly appreciated.

Offline johnu

  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #43 on: Dec 22, 2010, 14:20:16 »
Gary you are correct.  I am trying as much as possible to mimick modern sportbike geometry.  The fzrswing arm is almost exactly the same length as the original arm.  I love doing this stuff, as you say the challenge is a big part of the project for a lot of us.  That being said obviously I will not cut off the head tube if other options bring me to the desired geometry.

Offline johnu

  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #44 on: Dec 23, 2010, 20:44:18 »
Did some work on the new swingarm mounting point today. I canted the frame to the spec on my cad drawing which gives me 24* rake angle.  The swingarm is at 10* and doesn't look bad.  The issue of whether or not to cut off the headstock tube is decided because the Kawi fork pivot tube doesn't quite fit through the original that's on the bike.  I will have a new tube made and use the stock Kawi bearings just to keep things easy.  Still can't believe how far away the counter shaft center is from the swingarm pivot!

Offline 50gary

  • Posts: 585
  • Under the Limelight
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #45 on: Dec 24, 2010, 00:39:41 »
Johnu, you're on the right road in my opinion.  I like the looks thus far, the Swingarm is indeed along way from the countershaft.
 I was thinking simply remove the rear most engine mount, machine the mount off and re-weld another rear mount
That way I could move the S/A pivot forward by 30mm?   That  would be major but doable.  On a more realistic level I would mount the S/A right about where you have the mock up.  I have a plan for our T500 that is to remove the pivot plate as you have done and use four new plates, two per side with a welded in steel boss between each pair of plates.   I would run the plates up to the new angled tube you have already put in place and down to the original tube of course, fairly thin as then each side of the frame tube would be stressed  using chromoly sheet,  Also a cross tube  between the new angled tubes just above the chain.   The other advantage to cutting off the head tube is you can shorten the top tube a bit if need be.   I wouldn't think tire clearence  wil be a problem, with a smaller diameter tire and a more vertical compression path at 24 degrees.  I 'm guess-timating  using a 30" fork length as an average you'll save about 2.635" on de-raking alone and another .5" on the triple clamp offset.  That will be a huge difference.  Did you measure the layout before you took the bike apart?  I would measure the overall Wheelbase and the front wheelbase from the axle to the crankshaft and then crankshaft to the rear axle.  Just tossing out some ideas, this is very interesting to say the least.
  Cheers, 50gary
« Last Edit: Dec 24, 2010, 01:13:55 by 50gary »
Short track speedskating, cycling, guitars, motorcycles, juggling dynamite. I was born to laugh at Tornadoes.

Offline teazer

  • DTT SUPPORTER
  • *
  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 8206
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #46 on: Dec 24, 2010, 02:58:47 »
Another thing to check is the chain run.  place a rear hub and sprocket in place and make sure that the chain is clear of the top of the swingarm.

And then check the chain geometry to make sure it creates negative squat at the rear under power - Tony Foale's book or John Robinson's will help there. 

Check with All balls for those bearings.  check the 636 bearing ID and the T500 OD and see if there's something that will work.  The next simple idea is to consider either machining the stem slightly for a smaller lower bearing or making sleeves if the only option is a bearing with the correct T500 OD but larger bore than the stem.

Or have a new stem machined - all easier and cheaper than cutting its head off.





Offline teazer

  • DTT SUPPORTER
  • *
  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 8206
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #47 on: Dec 24, 2010, 03:06:31 »
I like the 24 degree rake simply because that's the sportbike norm.  The design goal (as I understand it) is to achieve as close to sportbike properties in a tube frame as reasonably possible.  Many T500 race guys shorten the standard swingarm to help quicken the steering by making the wheelbase shorter.  I think this is backwards to modern thinking, swingarms are now longer and steering head angles steeper. the current thinking is to load the front more if I understand correctly?  I did a similar project and had very good results.  Plus the challenge is a big part of any project.    Two cents.
  Cheers, 50gary

Gary, I'm not sure I totally agree. modern bikes do have steeper steering and less offset and much stiffer frames around the steering head. Engines are mounted further forward to shift teh weight distribution forward and that requires a longer swingarm to maintain a reasonable wheelbase.

What you are seeing on race bikes (apart from copy cat type imitation) is shorter swingrams to make for a more agile bike. The idea is that a shorter wheelbase is more beneficial than the adverse effects of shift in weight distribution.  Longer shocks and slightly shorter front forks cuse the bike to be more nose heavy, so overall it works.

On this bike we have shorter forks, much less offset and stock swingarm, so we have significant forward movement of CofG and less trail and rake.  Once it's mocked up it will be possible to measure CofG position and compare that to stock.

Should be a nice bike, but I would be wary of simply trying to paste modern geometry onto an old bike without making the frame a lot stiffer than stock in th vertical and horizontal planes.  I'l leave some lateral flex in there.

Offline johnu

  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #48 on: Dec 24, 2010, 18:39:47 »
Johnu, you're on the right road in my opinion.  I like the looks thus far, the Swingarm is indeed along way from the countershaft.
 I was thinking simply remove the rear most engine mount, machine the mount off and re-weld another rear mount
That way I could move the S/A pivot forward by 30mm?   That  would be major but doable.  On a more realistic level I would mount the S/A right about where you have the mock up.  I have a plan for our T500 that is to remove the pivot plate as you have done and use four new plates, two per side with a welded in steel boss between each pair of plates.   I would run the plates up to the new angled tube you have already put in place and down to the original tube of course, fairly thin as then each side of the frame tube would be stressed  using chromoly sheet,  Also a cross tube  between the new angled tubes just above the chain.   The other advantage to cutting off the head tube is you can shorten the top tube a bit if need be.   I wouldn't think tire clearence  wil be a problem, with a smaller diameter tire and a more vertical compression path at 24 degrees.  I 'm guess-timating  using a 30" fork length as an average you'll save about 2.635" on de-raking alone and another .5" on the triple clamp offset.  That will be a huge difference.  Did you measure the layout before you took the bike apart?  I would measure the overall Wheelbase and the front wheelbase from the axle to the crankshaft and then crankshaft to the rear axle.  Just tossing out some ideas, this is very interesting to say the least.
  Cheers, 50gary

Removing the rear engine mount is pretty ambitious!  I too would have liked to create the double sheet metal mounting plate you describe, however my swing arm is wider than the inside of the frame tubes.  I do plant to go  up and attach to the new bracing though.  My original wheelbase was 58.75" on my cad drawing the new wheelbase should be 56.25".

Offline johnu

  • DTT BOTM WINNER
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
Re: My Suzi T500 Project
« Reply #49 on: Dec 24, 2010, 18:44:20 »
Teaser, what suggestions do you have for stiffening the frame?