Cycle Kar(t) now Electrathon car

Are you planning a body or just leaving it open? It is a great project, wish I had that opportunity when I was in school. We just dropped eggs from the top of a ladder. I guess to prove we could drop eggs!
Haha. We will do a body. The kids are voting on a design direction for the body, but we have a ways to go before we get that far. I have to find a sponsor for the drive system, so it'll be a bunch of soapbox style testing until we get one.
 
I see you are using a standard kart spindle now. That is the right move.

Run those in the lowest Ackerman setting possible (will explain). Generally that means the holes furthest from the center of the chassis. With your rack setup you will have to measure this though. Just measure the width of a point on the wheels when they are at zero toe, then turn to lock, and measure the difference (front to back on the wheel). This will tell you how much toe you gain or lose across your degree of lock.

With three wheels you have zero rear roll stiffness. The only way you can generate that is via the front. Your spindles have significant scrub radius, meaning any castor (spindle bolt top closer to rear axle) while create significant lowering of the outside front tire and a raising of inside front bolt. This helps center the steering going straight, but will create a chassis that wants to roll outward with (especially) three wheels. Ackerman would only make this worse as the inside front will turn greater and lower further. Additionally, a three wheel vehicle tends to turn very quickly as a result of zero differential action (needed). Ackerman increases turn in, meaning if you have a bunch of ackerman you are looking at a really unstable vehicle at turn in.
 
Also, run the wheels as close to the spindle bolt as possible, that will reduce scrub radius.
 
I see you are using a standard kart spindle now. That is the right move.

Run those in the lowest Ackerman setting possible (will explain). Generally that means the holes furthest from the center of the chassis. With your rack setup you will have to measure this though. Just measure the width of a point on the wheels when they are at zero toe, then turn to lock, and measure the difference (front to back on the wheel). This will tell you how much toe you gain or lose across your degree of lock.

With three wheels you have zero rear roll stiffness. The only way you can generate that is via the front. Your spindles have significant scrub radius, meaning any castor (spindle bolt top closer to rear axle) while create significant lowering of the outside front tire and a raising of inside front bolt. This helps center the steering going straight, but will create a chassis that wants to roll outward with (especially) three wheels. Ackerman would only make this worse as the inside front will turn greater and lower further. Additionally, a three wheel vehicle tends to turn very quickly as a result of zero differential action (needed). Ackerman increases turn in, meaning if you have a bunch of ackerman you are looking at a really unstable vehicle at turn in.
Thanks for all the input. Lots of teaching points and I’m thankful.

Here is our spindle setup before mounting to the axle. The scrub radius, with neutral camber measures 2” with the spacer inboard and 1” with the spacer outboard. I hope I’m correct in wanting to set up this up positive and that 2” is not a bad number.

B8BE6F0A-EF48-4282-91BC-F8F3980A701A.jpeg
 
Thanks for all the input. Lots of teaching points and I’m thankful.

Here is our spindle setup before mounting to the axle. The scrub radius, with neutral camber measures 2” with the spacer inboard and 1” with the spacer outboard. I hope I’m correct in wanting to set up this up positive and that 2” is not a bad number.

View attachment 231249

Scrub radius is called “scrub” for exactly why you think it is. For an efficiency vehicle I doubt you really want to incorporate it. At a minimum just space the wheel in as far as it goes.

As for camber run as little you can. Camber thrust is a form of scrub.
 
What is the highest efficiency drive train? Belt? Chain? Gear? CVT metal belt? I imagine the electric motor has a broad RPM band where it is efficient, so probably doesn't need that last one.
 
What is the highest efficiency drive train? Belt? Chain? Gear? CVT metal belt? I imagine the electric motor has a broad RPM band where it is efficient, so probably doesn't need that last one.
Chain drives are actually more efficient. You don’t want a CVT, because it eliminates regenerative braking. This is the same reason why you don’t want to run a freewheel. There are also more sprocket options with chain drives vs belts.
 
E5C5D720-3832-400A-A48A-371D4FF147DD.jpeg
Our brake setup will look like this on the front. Race rules require a stop distance of less than 40ft @ 25mph. I had to machine a shaft collar to mount the bracket that can slide on a set screw groove machined in the spindle.

6D904E0A-6D2A-413E-9107-2813D6FAD072.jpeg
Rear wheel is mounted in a CB360 swing arm. Took a couple of spacers and collars to get the dimensions right, but a fair setup.
C66B2BD3-8C4E-4B58-B25F-5C92E3BE44A5.jpeg

The swing arm is mounted with two linkages that allow us to raise and lower the rear end. Race rules require the vehicle to be 1.5in off the ground to prevent a slide in the event of a flat tire.

EB860CD7-F9BF-464B-A606-EB7659757AC5.jpeg
We tested our ride height. The front axle is mounted on a pad which will let us shim for ride height and castor adjust.

We’re now at a point where I need to convince the team that we should compete with one driver and build the rest of the car around her. At opposite ends of the spectrum, we have a female who’s 5’4” and 130lbs. She’s a champion mountain biker who isn’t unfamiliar with competing. On the other end, we have a legit D1 prospect football player who’s 6’4” 210lbs and has shoulders that don’t fit in the frame of the car as it is. He’s our best skill driver. I’m going to do my best to get this team onboard with our female driver during competition.
 
Hell, I'll drive the thing. You had me at "motor de-governored with a Mikuni TM24 upgrade", and I'll stick around for the blue skies and an afternoon spent in board shorts.
 
Looks sweet! Those brakes I would think will be more than adequate, of course I am not sure how much battery load you will carry.

The girl is the right choice. All she has to do is keep the thing on the road. The less turning the better.
 
We pulled it off the table and tested our steering. It works pretty well. There’s room for more angle on the wheels, but I think we’re well within need for any turn we will encounter. I need to dig around to find out what the radius should be. We also tested our yoke in both directions. It’s going to stay with the bars facing up, but with a few inches removed.


BF770BB4-FF64-4A93-B020-1A4822C1D043.jpeg

3A8C47B3-0D9C-41AA-847F-92CFBEDB8B02.jpeg

BB0826C6-6B94-4660-9C53-E90726024B6D.jpeg

DD937C22-B16C-4B8A-B3F9-0872235A88CF.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom