Roc City Cafe said:
uhm... just noticed something... peculiar... what's the wheelbase and trail? and if you know, what are they based on? to me it looks like an ultrashort wheelbase and very very low trail due to the stock offset clamps and what looks to be about a 20' rake... if you hit the brakes, it looks like it would almost go to negative trail... that's bad last time I checked
Here's the details on fork geometry, the plan was to have 27* built into
the frame but after jigging and welding, ended up at 26 degrees, of
course that also depends on front & rear ride height, Trail is 3.8"
with 2.1" straight offset in the triple clamps. If it turns out I need
something different, I can machine some billet triples with the
corrections. The wheel base is a short 52", which I like for less lean
angle.
Bert Jan said:
With all the love and money and effort you guys put into this, i do not understand for the love of god why you put the rearsets on the swinger. It'll ride shit, you will be sick in 10 minutes because your feet location does not correspond with the seat. Your mind does not get it and will think your on a boat. Its like sea sickness.
it looks nice though
As to the pegs mounted on swing arm, 2" of rear axle travel amounts
to .5" of peg movement. The controls do move in relationship to the
pegs however, so will have to see how that works out. The only real
detriment is if you ride with a lot of your body weight on the pegs, it
becomes added to to the rear unsprung weight. Not a problem here.
As forgetting sick after ten minutes of riding, I'm not sure I'm that
sensitive, I have been seasick, but my ass and feet were moving a hell
of a lot more than half inch.
Of course a person wants to build the best bike he can within
reason, but this is after all a home made "Cafe Racer", which is a
derogatory term for a wannabe racer, not a factory G/P bike. A bar
hopper if you like.