Rag reviews these days are pretty interesting, either they nit pic a bike that I'd never be able to ride to it's limits. Or they complain about a street bike doesn't have 300 h.p. or handles like a bike three times the cost.
I bought a bike a few years back with out reading any review on it. When I got it home I found reviews basically saying it was the second coming.... The very next year, the bike was considered a Dinosaur by several rags. Nothing changed, it was the same bike. They beat the hell out of this poor thing, then a little later it was considered a "best buy" for used bikes in a couple other rags.
I still want a Triumph, this review just opened my eyes to a few things that will make the bike better, if addressed. I know a Thruxton isn't ever going to be on par with my Aprilia, but ridden within it's context, it is a blast to ride, I really enjoyed it and hope to add one to the garage next year, although that new FZ09 looks to be a pretty neat bike.... Ugh! I need to seek some help.