surely as an engineer you know that the crankshaft expands at excactly the same rate as the flywheel ? it is a very close to a self holding taper, that is what it is called in engineer speak,only a narrow range of tapers fits this descriptioncxman said:as an engineer i have often thought that what happens is the retainer bolt provides inward tension (tightening)
and constant low level heating and cooling causes expansion and contraction
that must tighten it on the taper over time
JMO
with a proper puller they come right off no issuesTim said:That must have been a relief.
Smarter people than me designed it, but I don't get why rotors need to be such a pain to pull. Is it the weight of the rotor that requires it to be so solidly mounted to the crank? Lot of other heavy assemblies spin at the same or similar RPM (clutch basket springs to mind) but simply slide on. Is it because the rotor is a 'consumable' and therefore they don't want to invest in complex machining to have a secure mount that is also easy to remove like the gears on the transmission as another example?