Custom frame build cb360

Re: Ground up custom frame build, need help!

this is getting weird in a familiar sort of way... ;)

Heres a 360 thats a work of art and is functional.

11494-230415200037.jpeg
 
Re: Ground up custom frame build, need help!

VonYinzer said:
Those frame pieces + a cb360 motor = bad things...

I'm all for going off script but do some research on frame fabrication first. I know you say this is just for show but why not make it functional too?

The tubing is actually just fine for a frame, just sounds more ridiculous when I share where it came from than anything else. The main reason this is not going to be a functional rider is the rake I plan on. The trail is going to be tremendous. I'm still playing with different design options, so once I have something mocked up we will see.
 
Re: Ground up custom frame build, need help!

trek97 said:
this is getting weird in a familiar sort of way... ;)

Heres a 360 thats a work of art and is functional.

11494-230415200037.jpeg

Yea I know the motor is rough haha. That's a great 360. I think once I have something mocked up everyone will see I'm not as crazy as it would seem. I'm trying to get it long and low, which is going to present some challenges, but nothing above what I can tackle ( I hope ???)

I have to get some more components ready to start building the frame, hope to have something layed out Monday or Tuesday.
 
So since me and a buddy werent in the mood to work on finishing the projects we have close to done, this happened to a stock 360 frame.
 

Attachments

  • 20151024_144144.jpg
    20151024_144144.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 168
So we decided to throw a 3.5 inch stretch in the rear, makes for much more room for the seat sonce im think of running 90/90 21 for the wheel/tire combo. Have to finish bentong up the tube, should have it all tacked up and together tomorrow, then i can ditch the swingarm.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20151027_155103.jpg
    IMG_20151027_155103.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 153
the top tube is a glaring issue.you see it is not just the size of tube .was the wall thickness even the same as a 360 ? but also the length of run makes more difference than the gauge of tube and also how straight that tube is and above all how much it is allowed to deflect/flex regularly in its use because of the overall design
i wish you well and hope you realize that if all of these things are ignored and allowed to come into play you end up with a cascading effect much greater than any single one
it is astounding but i think you hit the mark on all of them unless you plan on at least doubling or tripleing the flex resistance with gusseting alone
im just sayin
 
xb33bsa said:
the top tube is a glaring issue.you see it is not just the size of tube .was the wall thickness even the same as a 360 ? but also the length of run makes more difference than the gauge of tube and also how straight that tube is and above all how much it is allowed to deflect/flex regularly in its use because of the overall design
i wish you well and hope you realize that if all of these things are ignored and allowed to come into play you end up with a cascading effect much greater than any single one
it is astounding but i think you hit the mark on all of them unless you plan on at least doubling or tripleing the flex resistance with gusseting alone
im just sayin

If you take a close look theres a football field of room between the backbone and the bottom motor mounts. A second backbone is going in, which will serve as the top motor mount. The gussets will go in after that. Also adding tubing around other joints around the frame to gain strength. Then gussets will be added as well. That is only the general design, I was anxious to get it in a roller. I will be going overkill with getting it good and rigid. As far as the metal in the backbone, exact same wall thickness as what was there.
 
jag767 said:
If you take a close look theres a football field of room between the backbone and the bottom motor mounts. A second backbone is going in, which will serve as the top motor mount. The gussets will go in after that. Also adding tubing around other joints around the frame to gain strength. Then gussets will be added as well. That is only the general design, I was anxious to get it in a roller. I will be going overkill with getting it good and rigid. As far as the metal in the backbone, exact same wall thickness as what was there.
thumbs up ;)
 
XB here is what my thoughts are:

the green tube I am not sure about but think its not a bad idea. The marks in black I'm doing tomorrow
 

Attachments

  • cb360a1.jpg
    cb360a1.jpg
    850.5 KB · Views: 178
:) splendid carry on 8) ts gonna be bitchen you may consider something to help stiffen that upper middle junction in the horizontal plane as well
 
xb33bsa said:
:) splendid carry on 8) ts gonna be bitchen you may consider something to help stiffen that upper middle junction in the horizontal plane as well

Hooray glad to get a blessing from someone in the know! Hmm Tube or plate?
 
the green tube could help but im not sure it is correct if you look at a ducati space frame for example the inner lattice tubes are not coming in at 90 degrees they all walk through more like 45's in pairs
and the gussets should always be on the outside near center line not the closest center reach
 
xb33bsa said:
the green tube could help but im not sure it is correct if you look at a ducati space frame for example the inner lattice tubes are not coming in at 90 degrees they all walk through more like 45's in pairs
and the gussets should always be on the outside near center line not the closest center reach

Gotcha. I will see what I can come up with. 1/4 inch plate enough? I have some 3/8 laying around too.
 
Why the need to add all that strengthening on a piece of art. Why would you completely rebuild a motor on an art bike that won't be ridden. I smell a liar justifying his plans.
 
jag767 said:
Hooray glad to get a blessing from someone in the know! Hmm Tube or plate?
it could be either
some tony foale on gussets scroll down the page
http://www.tonyfoale.com/Articles/Frame.mod/KawaMods.htm
 
o1marc said:
Why the need to add all that strengthening on a piece of art. Why would you completely rebuild a motor on an art bike that won't be ridden. I smell a liar justifying his plans.

plans change my friend ??? ::) ;D
 
Well, I was all set to sit back and watch your very interesting project, but decided I would add my 2 cents. The lovely curved elements you want to use make a pretty complicated structure from a "what will it do, how safe will it be and what will be likely to fail" perspective. I realize you are not building a road race bike, but I am getting the vibe that you do want it to be functional and not dangerous. I say go all in on the curves and go forward not expecting to put a million miles on it. With that in mind, I offer the following suggestion. It will still be bendy, but "eagle eye" engineering says it should have pretty good lifespan before it fatigues noticeably. Even bendy things need loads spread out a bit to not have them gang up too much on a particular point. I will leave it to you to conjure gusseting if you like this direction. Looking forward to see where you go with this project!
 

Attachments

  • MOBIUS edit 1.jpg
    MOBIUS edit 1.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 188
Back
Top Bottom