No! That's simply not the case! Where do you come up with that kind of BS idea?!?!?!?!
Union and non union workers alike have made great progress over the years in creating a reasonably fair and equitable work/ employee relationship. As well as safe working environments that are mandated by law.
The employer doesn't NOT have the right to make any rule they like! Only Wall street can do that
You are joking...right?
So it's OK for them to be addicted to nicotine or alcohol or play Bingo or but lottery tickets (etc) but to receive government assistance they have to be clean of dope. Maybe we need to make them do crap jobs for the assistance. Oh, and maybe they should be forced to live in government housing. As you can possibly tell, I don't share your POV.
You know we all receive some government benefits of some description. Where do you draw the line?
OK on to topic.
To descriminate against employees who smoke dope is highly unfair.
I'm am saying that if it can be proven that an employee created a problem due to impairment, from ANY drug, they should be held accountable.
This includes booze and prescription pills. Or texting and cell phone calls , for that matter!
But to just focus on pot is one sided and as close to unconstitutional as you can get.
I'm against random drug testing and I am for testing for impairment if an accident or dangerous incident occurs.
It's fine to say that you have a choice not to work for an employer that has drug teasting but what about YOUR rights if they decide to test after you are hired?
What you do on your own time is your concern as long as it doesn't affect others.
Gosh, next maybe they will test to see if you are "insert choice here" and fire you for that. :
Okaaaaay...I'll put my soap box away now ...where is that 10mm wrench? ;D