JustinLonghorn
No Purple Hearts, No Blue Ribbons
Good to hear you went with the B and S motor. My Kohler motor based one was pretty awful.
VonYinzer said:Got a decent deal.on this one. Under a grand for a 15.5hp B&S motor and 42" fully adjustable deck. With free shipping.
Replaced the snapper with a 67 wheel horse. Then replaced the boat anchor tecumseh with a HF specialMaritime said:I owned a snapper, first lawn tractor, was great, couldn't kill it. I sold it with the house.......should of kept it.
deviant said:Should've invested in pavement instead of a mower.
Two questions:Sonreir said:Got 40 of these bad boys fresh in stock.
MOSFET regulator / rectifiers.
http://www.sparckmoto.com/Products
Tune-A-Fish said:For? KZ1000? I just got a cheap one but what the heck.
snmavridis said:Two questions:
What's the difference between your r/r and the MOSFET?
Which one makes you more money?
I need to buy one and I'll let you choose which one I get
Sonreir said:Should fit most years. Let me know your year and I'll check.
Are those a series rr or shunt?Sonreir said:MOSFET is generally a better quality of R/R. They respond to voltage changes better and regulate the voltage more closely to their target specification. They also generate less waste heat.
It's sort of like comparing modern transistors to old vacuum tubes. The new stuff is better in most ways.
I make more per unit on the MOSFETs but the markup on our own brand of R/R (based on older thyresistor technology) is better.
Depends on what you're talking about. When it comes to sound, a vacuum tube is far superior. If you're basing a transistor's superiority on low cost, size, and low power consumption then sure, but in the case of sound production the disadvantages far outnumber the advantages. If it weren't for the ability to mass produce them for next to nothing and our need to have things as small as possible or mobile, then we'd still be listening to music through tube amplifiers. And while a transistor is more durable from the perspective of abuse, a vacuum tube can much better handle voltage spikes or overloads. Transistors have virtually zero tolerance for such things. So, if the sound really matters then you will go with vacuum tubes.Sonreir said:It's sort of like comparing modern transistors to old vacuum tubes. The new stuff is better in most ways.
downeaster said:Are those a series rr or shunt?
deviant said:Depends on what you're talking about. When it comes to sound, a vacuum tube is far superior. If you're basing a transistor's superiority on low cost, size, and low power consumption then sure, but in the case of sound production the disadvantages far outnumber the advantages. If it weren't for the ability to mass produce them for next to nothing and our need to have things as small as possible or mobile, then we'd still be listening to music through tube amplifiers. And while a transistor is more durable from the perspective of abuse, a vacuum tube can much better handle voltage spikes or overloads. Transistors have virtually zero tolerance for such things. So, if the sound really matters then you will go with vacuum tubes.
Very awesome site. Yeah, I think that debate will never go away. Some things can be scientifically proven, some cannot.CarbsAndCylinders said:Tubes vs transistors, still debated in hifi circles. Here is a ste you might find interesting, deviant; http://www.space-tech-lab.com/ .
When science can't prove it, actuaries will BS you into believing their numbers!deviant said:Very awesome site. Yeah, I think that debate will never go away. Some things can be scientifically proven, some cannot.