Ringo said:
;D
Back on topic, I will post this controverial tidbit. I am a firm believer in context--particularly when it comes to motorcycles. What I mean by this is the following: If I was ultimately primarily concerned with my safety, I would not be riding motorcycles. Take the car with side airbags, belts, etc. Not that I am cavalier about safety on my bikes. I own leather, armor, helmets, and the like--and use them regularly as well. I find it really ironic all of the 'gear' that is worn without context to safety--chaps for abrasion but no helmet--helmet only with jeans and t-shirt--jacket and helmet with jeans and tennis shoes....
There are times for me when the simple thrill of being on the bike--out in the open, wind in my face--absolutely trumps the safety card, and i ride in street clothes and goggles.
I don't even wear sunscreen.
Is it unsafe? Yes. But is it sometimes more about living the experience than providing for my safety at every turn? Also yes. Its not that i don't understand or even ignore the risks. There are certain types of riding that I only do with as much gear on as I can manage, and never attempt without gear. But in those instance where I choose not to wear it, it is a matter of prioritizing those moments in my life that i can later relish (even if it is from a wheelchair) and say that
I did that. Is this dumb? Absolutely, but so is getting out of bed in the morning. Riding a bike without another helmet on occasion is one of those calculated risks not unlike crossing the street or skydiving. Geez, my first car didn't even have seatbelts!
I'm not decrying the AGATT guys, or even endorsing riding without a helmet. I'm merely stating my reality when it comes to this kind of thing. The law of averages mandates this won't work for everyone--but nothing ever really does...