Maritime said:Me to, the enfields look nice but quality is not near the level of Yamaha, fit and finish is hit or miss on the Enfield and should be a non issue on the SR.
Hoofhearted said:66 m.p.h. top speed??? How sad. No progress. I guess if people want a "vintage " look they'll get a less than vintage top speed as well. 66 m.p.h. really??? Talk about a plonker. My guess is there will be about 20-25 suckers who will buy one.
Maritime said:According to google the Japanese market SR400 does 91 MPH so this one should be close if not exactly the same. Removing the big catalized muffler will also put it on a diet and free up HP. Is it perfect, nope, but snagging one used in a couple years from a hipster who hardly road it sounds good to me.
vibration said:So SR400 or new Enfield Continental GT?...same price
True, but how cool, is any woman that doesDrJ said:I'd never consider buying and Enfield. I worked on one and had a close look. The machining and metal quality was way below any Japanese bike. Hell, even my 40 year old Honda has higher material and build quality. But a lot of women won't buy the SR because it's kickstart only.
vibration said:SR weighs less @ 400cc and kick only. GT @ 535cc has both kick and electric start. Stock top end on the SR is listed as 66 vs. 85 for the GT.