buzznichols
Been Around the Block
I'm waiting to start my build thread because of camera troubles, so in the meantime...
I've been riding for some twenty years, half my life. I'll give you a second to do the math.
In that time, I've owned 3 CB 750's, a Water Buffalo, and a Norton Atlas. All popular platforms for cafe racers. Why, then, am I now, at this late date, doing my first cafe build on a 1980 Suzuki GS 850?
In short, because I can hardly make it any uglier.
The aforementioned bikes were all head-turners without any modifications. I just couldn't bring myself to start modifying the looks of bikes, when I liked their looks so much to start.
Granted, a top-shelf CB 750 cafe build (like the August DDT bike of the month - hubba hubba) is a thing of exceptional beauty. However, a middle-of-the-road cafe build of the same bike is no more beautiful than a well maintained bone stock CB. And, of course, a shoddy cafe build on a bike that started out beautiful is just tragic.
I wouldn't go saying it around the nice folks over at the GS Forum, but the GS 850 is just a dogshit ugly - although reasonably well engineered - bike. It takes a lot of the pressure off knowing that, whatever I do, I can't make it any less appealing.
Likewise, I love seeing cafe builds of stuff like Goldwings and Ventures. It seems like every piece of superfluous crap stripped off of these bikes reveals a cool machine that's been hiding underneath.
Also, I wonder if stock CB's might be like plains buffalo and Texan oil - a resource that seems inexhaustible until it's been utterly depleted
I've been riding for some twenty years, half my life. I'll give you a second to do the math.
In that time, I've owned 3 CB 750's, a Water Buffalo, and a Norton Atlas. All popular platforms for cafe racers. Why, then, am I now, at this late date, doing my first cafe build on a 1980 Suzuki GS 850?
In short, because I can hardly make it any uglier.
The aforementioned bikes were all head-turners without any modifications. I just couldn't bring myself to start modifying the looks of bikes, when I liked their looks so much to start.
Granted, a top-shelf CB 750 cafe build (like the August DDT bike of the month - hubba hubba) is a thing of exceptional beauty. However, a middle-of-the-road cafe build of the same bike is no more beautiful than a well maintained bone stock CB. And, of course, a shoddy cafe build on a bike that started out beautiful is just tragic.
I wouldn't go saying it around the nice folks over at the GS Forum, but the GS 850 is just a dogshit ugly - although reasonably well engineered - bike. It takes a lot of the pressure off knowing that, whatever I do, I can't make it any less appealing.
Likewise, I love seeing cafe builds of stuff like Goldwings and Ventures. It seems like every piece of superfluous crap stripped off of these bikes reveals a cool machine that's been hiding underneath.
Also, I wonder if stock CB's might be like plains buffalo and Texan oil - a resource that seems inexhaustible until it's been utterly depleted