Re: CB550 alloy sprint
Swagger said:
What 'level' would you like to point out on the Matchless?
My 'carbon copy' comment was more biased toward the misconception that there must be some kind of flat line along to bottom of the tank and seat base. Stupidest BS I've heard (continually) in quite a while pertaining to bike...
News flash! It's not BS but it's not well explained. Most bikes look "right" when there's a natural looking line or lines from front to rear.
A typical Brit bike has what I refer to as "Table top" styling. In other words the bottom of the tank and seat are one long more or less straight line. That long line connects the whole bike into one continuous look. Top half fairings are often arranged so that their lower edge follows that same straight line.
Interestingly enough, if it's literally one straight line it looks forced and unnatural.
The next most common line is a continuous curve from somewhere around the front disk under the fairing and tank and seat. BMW Cup bikes are a good example of that approach. Again, it gives a continuity to the look.
If that curve is too perfect like it was on a couple of Bimotas, it looks unnatural.
On the G50/7R, the line is more imaginary, and what makes it work is the curve of the tank into the seat that connects them and provides linkage between teh different design elements.
If you look at a CB750/900/1100 series or Superdream, Honda made the rear of the tank swoop dwon and connected visually with the side panels which connected into the shape of the seat hump.
So it's not so much about a "line" as it is about the shapes working together to create a visual flow. That's one of many design elements that make a bike look "right" and where so many go wrong with seats that don't match the style or line of the tank.
On this bike, the tank is really nice but it looks as if it is too high at the front and that is jarring to the eye. It doesn't look "right". What that means is that our brains see shapes and looks them up in a mental database of shapes. In my case that "database" is full of old Tritons etc as well as natural shapes like meandering rivers which flow in nice curves. Other nice curves also come to mind, so to my eye, flowing curves look "right"
Cliffs and rocks are also natural but they suggest sudden change, discordant effects and complete absence of flow. They suggest aggression, power pushing through with brute force etc, so an angular bike can also look good but it's a harder to pull off.
We each see thing differently based on our own unique visual and emotional experiences
BTW Wings look like a Matchless or Aston Martin etc so they look "right" but run the risk of looking too much like a copy. Why not try something completely different.
Maybe a simple M leaning forward into the wind with say a slight suggestion of a tail to indicate the wind behind it