Texasstar
Can't is a four letter dirty word
my math formula was wrong once again I didn't account for preload for the Kpmi spring when I took 123/.354*.244. The correct formula isTexasstar said:is this correct? We want to compare the aftermarket lift to the stock lift of the 175 which is .244 or .9173" that is in the manual. Most aftermarket race proven springs for the 160/170 are giving lift pressures at .354 - .40" lift. For example the KPMI is 123lbs@.354". So if we divide the 123 by .354 and multiply it by .244" we would end up with the equivalent lift pressure which is 84.77lbs @.244" lift for the KPMI valve springs.
The stock 175 is 98.54lbs at .244" lift. We confirmed that the 175 stock spring is 100#@.275" lift.
If that is correct the KPMI has less pressure than the stock 175 leaving us with other questions. Is valve float mainly caused by resonance? Is KPMI springs making an assumption that the max rpm for the 175 will remain the stock rpm? Why in the heck would we buy KPMI springs to replace the stock springs? (The resonance data for the KPMI springs is not available.)
123-47=76
76 / .354 * .244 =52.38
Add the pre load 47 plus 52.38= 99.38 for the Kpmi which is the roughly the same as what we got for the stock spring nose pressure at .275" lift.
My wife is getting real world examples to tell her math students...lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk