I had little accident... completly crash my car on highway

but today had time for Ducati susspension.
I bought from Ducati SuperSport 2001 and borrow one from Ducati Monster 900 2002 to compare and show you why choose SS.
First few fork measured datas:
Yamaha (1T5 from 78')
- Fork leg length (top to axle center) 790mm
- Fork pitch 185mm
- Inner fork tube diameter 36mm
- Outer fork tube diameter 48mm
- Axel diameter 17mm
- Travel 170mm
- Offset 45mm
Ducati Monster 900 2002
- Fork leg length (top to axle center) 695mm
- Fork pitch 205mm
- Inner fork tube diameter 43mm
- Outer fork tube diameter 50/54mm
- Axel diameter 25mm
- Travel 130mm
- Offset 30mm
Ducati 900 Super Sport 2001
- Fork leg length (top to axle center) 725mm
- Fork pitch 205mm
- Inner fork tube diameter 43mm
- Outer fork tube diameter 50/54mm
- Axel diameter 25mm
- Travel 120mm
- Offset 25mm
How does this affect the handling?
Serial Yamaha - trail and rake for Yamaha XS750 are 27 deg. and 114mm - This bike rides straight as an arrow, it’s super stable, and doesn't get upset by bumps or wind. The downside is that you have to muscle it into corners because the machine just loves going straight. Because of the long 170mm travel and a soft fork, the Yamaha dives hard under braking and squats when you hit the gas, which crazy changes the handling depending on the situation.
XS 750 with my baloon 4,5-18 rear and 4,0-19 front wheels - trail and rake are 27,5 deg. and 132mm - Yama rides like train... To restore the factory setup, the fork tubes need to be pushed up into the top triple tree.
XS with M900 USD - 24,2 deg and 123,5mm - the geometry is similar to the stock XS, bike tracks straight as an arrow and sometimes needs to be muscled into corners, but the stiffer fork, overall rigidity, and shorter travel provide stable handling and predictability under braking.
XS with 900 SuperSport fully regulated Showa USD - rake 25,4 deg with 137,5mm trail - The XS SS handles even heavier in corners than the stock 750 on baloon tires, riding like a Triumph Rocket and edging into Power Cruiser territory... but the big advantage is the fully adjustable Showa fork, with full control over preload, rebound, and compression.
However, there is a remedy: the difference in fork length between the M900 and 900SS stems from how the handlebars are mounted. The M900 fork ends flush with the top triple clamp (allowing clip-ons under the triple clamp), while the 900SS fork extends above it to accommodate clip-ons over the top triple clamp.
- 3cm lower and I have 24,15 deg. 126,8mm almost the same like M900 USD but with workout for me on corner.
- 3,5cm lower gives 23,95 deg. 124,1mm and it should play on corner like light street fighter and still will good straight.
It's not the end about fork.... to be continued.