Any opinions on new Royal Enfields?

Coupla things from a guy whose first bike was a modern Enfield 350 and just went to one of the classic iron barrels:

Old ones are truly 50s tech, combined with Indian manufacturing standards. Can be unreliable, especially due to quality control. Easy to work on overhead valve pushrod setup, easy to customize, kinda crude. Shifting is especially crude but workable. Continual maintenance required; you need to know the basics to own it. US models have a cobbly set of linkages to put the shift on the left and the brake on the right. Best altered back to the original right-shift setup. They can be hot-rodded to varying levels of performance; one company's "fireball" mod setup is supposed to really increase reliability and do the Ton pretty easily.

The new bikes are a different breed. They have more of a 70s/early 80s thing going on. Hydraulic tappets, unit-construction engine, fuel injection (on the export-model 500s), auto decomp, don't leak terribly badly, adequate electrical capacity, international standard controls, much slicker gearbox, etc. Much closer to turn-key transportation than the old bikes. Not so much aftermarket stuff available for them except cosmetics, although Ace Engineering, which does the Fireball bikes for the old iron barrels, is currently tearing down a UCE model and seeing what they can do to hop it up.

The very popular C5 models have no kickstarter, which I think is a huge liability with these bikes; the e-starts are pretty terrible and kicking is super-easy. They also use 18" wheels instead of the historical 19"; they have a reputation for instability at higher speed (as far as it goes) but no one has really figured out why, precisely. I like the B5, which looks a lot like the old Indian 350 models. The G5 is nice, too.

IHMO, the new ones are a bit like the new Camaros and Mustangs. They just lack a bit of presence compared to the originals, but do what they do pretty well without complaint.

Edit: Also, to complete the saga, there is a transitional bike between the iron barrel models and the new UCE ones: the alloy-barrel AVL engines, which were a slightly modernized take on the classic engines. Only made for a year or two.


My little lady likes what I did with this salvaged 1977 350cc military bike:

3646_03_05_12_12_27_41.jpg
 
Here is a picture of my 2005 RE Bullet Continental. I absolutely love mine, but I do know that what I have is not a modern bike but is essentially a 1955 RE, therefore I do not ride on the Freeway and only take her above 60 for very short bursts. But one day when she finally gives up I will rebuild her with either the Ace "Fireball 535" kit or the Hitchcocks 612 kit. Either of which will get me above the Ton.
The new RE's are not fast but with the revisions of FI and the unit construction engine are capable of highway speeds and are a little more maintenance free. The High speed wobble that some of them suffer from, I've been told can be caused by improper dealer set up (headstock not proper tightened) I don't know if that is for sure but that's what I've heard and changing from the 18" front wheel to the 19" front wheel.
This picture was taken at the Seattle Mods -vs- Rockers ride on June 2nd where it took the Best Rocker Award.

Damon

Enfieldrockers.jpg
 
you have to upkeep them... HAVE TO... but they are easy to wrench on... main thing is adjusting the cam chain and valves to keep things tiddy, also had to do a head gasket but that is pretty common and was really easy
here are some shot of my old one

images


wife riding it
images


and me ripping on it
26429-jrk5892-albums-324-a-couple-things-done-picture53862-royal-enfiled-riding-2.jpg
 
woooops! Swivel just shoot me a PM that i put Cam chain, not PRIMARY chain on my previous post under basic work that needs to be done... also the timing chain on occasion needs to be cleaned and lubed...
the main thing on these is the valves.... and they LET YOU KNOW when they start to get out of wack... they are noisy as hell as it is, but when they are realy out of adjustment it soudns like a bunch of bolts in your cases!
 
Swivel said:
As Swivel swoops the corner on his SR 500 at breakneck speed and takes the XS on the outside and clips the apex,at like twice the speed the the crowd rejoices! One handed smoking of a Cuban,and checking his twitter feed! "Yea verily he has fleetest foots,and fashion too".Sayeth:John,29,of 23 Farmhouse Rd.,New Somewhere.

Really...? lets ask some one around here that is "CREDIBLE" and honorable.... Tim! Will your SR walk away from your XS? Inquiring minds want to know... Honestly!

Me thinks your head is a little inflated. :)
 
Whats the difference between an SR and an Enfield?

Basically reliabilty. But both are plonkers.
 
if you plan on riding alot of HWY do not get an enfield... they are great back road bikes, mine handled like a dream as well or even around town... but touring is not their bag... least on mine... i rode it from chicago to STL, at about 65 mph... and it was screaming... had oil all over the place on the bike... was just to much for the single to handle for that long... on the way home i took all back roads and to this day that has been one of my fav motorcycle rides i have ever taken!
 
Back
Top Bottom