thanks, but that is as close as you can possibly get it. the primary case on the other side is rather large and that is your limiting factor!! I made the cradle for the pivot as small as possible and mounted it as close as I dear as not to have the motor rock into it. Will take a snap from the other side to give you a clearer view.xb33bsa said:noice work BUT what is the reasoning having the swinger pivot so far back from the c/s spocket ? you could have it a lot closer,what you have now is going to give some pretty serious chain slack/jacking issues
Thanks goldy, not to shabby for a dentist! There is nothing currently on the market that I want. I have an idea in my head that I am running with, the new Norton is at the top of my list, but I really want to run a V Twin. I looked at all different types of engine, and kept coming back to the Harley. So cant buy it, better get with the doing and make it! I have to say goldy, what a collection of scooters you have, very nice in deed sir!!goldy said:You Kiwis seem to have knack for doing some pretty amazing work at home without resorting to buying everything you need and simply assembling it. This will be one of a kind for sure...Bravo Zulu and keep it coming!
here in lies the problem of clearancexb33bsa said:noice work BUT what is the reasoning having the swinger pivot so far back from the c/s spocket ? you could have it a lot closer,what you have now is going to give some pretty serious chain slack/jacking issues
Have looked into this, was going to make a bracket that would in fact be the rear engine mount and swingarm pivot all in one. That was until the swingarm turned up and started doing some measurements and calculations. It could go forward, but the only way of doing it would be to machine the surface of the engine case flat, weld a alloy spigot into it and then tap it out to size. If you didn't do this, and plated it instead and then tapped into that to take the swingarm bolt, you would in fact push the swingarm out a minimum of 15mm, possibly 20mm to the right, and then you run into the problem of chain alignment, because this arm is designed to be bolted onto the side case, but has all ready had previsions to do this, so then you need to reduce the size of the pivot on the swingarm, and now the hole is getting deeper and deeper. The only way to move this any further forward that I can see is to in fact go and purchase a Buell engine, which I don't think is going to happen. I have to make do with what is there and work around the issues I encounter. I have a few people that are interested to see the final product, and may look at getting a frame. I need to try and make this as easy as possible.xb33bsa said:the way that swinger is narrow up front it could be shoved forward quite a bit .it would require of course an inboard location of the left side swinger spindle locating boss
thats a nice bit of work on that. I was trying to not cut the swingarm up at the front, and to get this up that close, this is what you would have to do. the front is allready at 23.5 deg, the head stock cant be pulled in any further. might have to re look at the complete thing again.brad black said:this one's got a forward and inboard lh pivot: http://www.bikeexif.com/dp-customs
can't you move the front wheel back a bit more? as long as the wheel doesn't hit anything at full compression there's no need to have it any further forward than that requires.
will do, just what was lying around, and this is why I didn't want to buy anymore at this point. what size do you make your frames out of?xb33bsa said:carry pn thenbut you need larger dia tube for the frame this time as well....
When I was setting up the swingarm last night, I was talking with a friend of mine about it. I said ‘I guarantee as soon as I post pictures of this there is a guy on the forum that will say you just cut away all the strength out of your swingarm and then throw in a engineers terminology to justify his statement’. I’m two from two!!xb33bsa said:you just milled away the majority of the thicker cross section which was thicker to be stronger to take lodes :-\ do you tram the head on your mill regularly ?