Film is a great way to learn settings and composure because you'll quickly find that its darned expensive just to waste film taking pictures of random stuff.
However, I don't think film is a requirement for taking good pictures.
Lots of old guys always say one of two things:
1) today, lots of people THINK they are good photographers
2) today, lots of people CAN BE good photographers
I heard from plenty of experienced photographer who grew their business on medium format and 35mm, and sometimes they give this vibe of "you don't have street cred if you haven't shot film."
The fact of that matter is, many of these same photographers also complain about the amount of competition they have, or their inability to keep up with all the technology coming from digital editing. The Brenizer Method for example, is a great way to make stunning pictures using software stitching. Ryan Brenizer is an awesome photographer, but his stiched shallow DOF panoramas are what has made him famous. Others have done it before, but he was the first to really put it on the map.
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]I think another thing to consider is your niche. You may find your horrible at taking pictures of people but awesome at taking pictures of cars or motorcycles. Some guys prefer landscape and architecture, others portraits and weddings. [/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Buy your equipment with an idea of what you want to do with it. [/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]I bought a 50-150mm f2.8 Sigma, and its sat in my bag most days because I just don't use long lenses. Every now and then I'll want a 500mm to take a picture of a bird in a far away tree...but how often does that moment happy? In the end, I use mostly primes like my 20mm or 50mm because I like getting in the face of my subject. [/font]