Matt we got something that looks top secret in the mail today! Is it a flux capacitor?Sonreir said:A key piece of information here is the RPM at which the engine is running. VE is not a static value.
What is a hindrance at low RPM may be a benefit as the RPMs rise. Only empirical testing will tell you for sure.
Texasstar said:Matt we got something that looks top secret in the mail today! Is it a flux capacitor?
Texasstar said:Teazer also because of bell I understand why you do what you do to your pistons. Proven material at speed. The meat is in the top of the piston. Decking piston lightens and places the compression ring closer to the top to dispel the heat and I bet you dropped one ring and modified the skirt. Bell said not to hold squish tolerances too close because of the fluidity of the charge....
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
These are Michael Moore's molds.teazer said:For swirl, I like tangential ports like an old Triumph twin. Honda tends to use ports that are straight into the center of the cylinder with zero swirl.
I like to weld on new intake stubs offset to the side to generate a slight swirl effect but that isn't always easy to achieve. Do not insert anything into the port to encourage swirl because the resistance will typically cost more flow that the improvement in swirl is worth.
When thinking about squish, think angled head surface like a 2 stroke and forget Quench and flat surface on a 4 stroke. Try to get the streams to collide near the plug for slightly less turbulence but better placed flame kernel in the middle of that tumbling storm of small gas droplets.
Texasstar said:Very!!!!! Cool!!!! We are dropping the starter, chain, and we will make/order a plug!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks Kiley! Zeke's 160, 175 and Mom's 200 are going to get them!Kanticoy said:Just thought I'd tell you that I have successfully run a cb200 on an Accel capacitor and nighthawk 250 reg/rec. it was also running a dyna twin tower coil. You had to blip it with the headlight on occasionally (35/35w), but it will purr all day long with no lighting at idle and beyond. The reason I mention this is that I have no doubts you'll be just fine running a capacitor on your stripped down racing machine and that charging system.
the pw26 superhawk carbs are HUGE compared to the intakes of the 175 and 200. When you said that the superhawk carbs would form the perfect intake shape I am assuming that using a 175 manifold cutting it in half, grinding smooth the ridges and then using radiator hose and then use another manifold that better port matches the manifold to the carb???? Thus creating the high speed area of the port...then on the intake raise the floor with devcon and port the ceiling. Is there a better manifold to work with on the pw26 side since the superhawk carbs were bolted to the head separated with a spacer?teazer said:Short skirts are always a problem but not in an engine. Long skirts help to stabilize the piston and reduce rocking but just for comparison check out any modern 600 piston. It's shorter than a CB200 and roughly twice the diameter (touch of hyperbole there but you see what I'm getting at) and no issues with rock (and roll).
I like them short to reduce viscous drag. The friction between the piston and bore is the single largest loss of power in an engine. Short skirts and excessive camming help a little, as do thin rings.
Swirl helps a little but squish helps more.
As long as your valves are partially shrouded by the bore, they will naturally generate some swirl.
The thing to notice about those port shapes is how low the roof is on the 175 and 200. That's where there's room for improvement, but the carb end of the port is already large enough relative to the valve seat and critical port diameter. Check the dimensions up and down the port to work out where metal has to be removed and where it should be added. I'm generally a fan of small carbs but those ports can use larger than "ideal" carbs to better match the other dimensions.
That's good info from Kiley about the alternator output.