That's not the whole story on fuel to be sure. Conventional gasoline has a lower heating value of 116,090 BTUs/US gallon or 42.791 MJ/Kg which is more appropriate. Fuel combusts on a stoichiometric basis at around 14.7:1 on mass not on volume, so specific gravity is important. Size matters
If your fuel burns at the same Stoic ratio and has the same density, it will potentially release the same energy as regular gasoline. If it releases that energy at a faster rate than gasoline it could potentially make more power as long as ignition timing is optimized to get peak pressure at the right time.
If your fuel has a lower SG and runs a lower ratio to air, it will burn more fuel and make more power for the same complete combustion. If not, it won't.
As you pointed out, Ethanol has a much lower energy density than gasoline at 26.952 MJ/Kg. BUT it burns at 9:1 releasing 2.99 MJ per KG of air consumed. Methanol is 3.11/Kg of air and makes 17% more power than gasoline if optimized to suit.
So if jetting is adjusted for the addition of ethanol and compression is raised to take advantage of the higher octane of ethanol, a ethanol blended gasoline will make more power than straight gas.
I'd be happy to add your fuel to the Alternative Fuel Comparison chart we developed recently for an Alternative fuel transportation lobby if it is intended for transportation use. It's all chemical soup to me.