mathil
Been Around the Block
teazer said:It's really subjective, but the seat shape doesn't look "right" with that tank. I suspect it's the roundness of the seat hump versus the sharper slab sides of the rear of the tank that mismatch. The tank has a very Benelli Mohave like shape and needs a seat that works with that oversize skinny rear tire. Much as I dislike tiny seat humps and short seats, I suspect that a very small hump would look right because it would accentuate the large diameter wheel where the current bump doesn't.
On a more serious note, what are you planning to do to stiffen that swingarm? As it is, it will bend at the brace and will fold up after a few hard bumps on potholes or speedbumps.
For the kicker, I'd remove it and blank it off for a more board track racer look and fit the electric foot which is pretty much unobtrusive on that motor. It will work well and look cleaner. IMHO
Yup, I've pretty much decided that the hump needs to be smaller length wise, height wise, and also that the sides shouldn't return down to 90*, but rather end on an angle.
Once there's a light tucked under and some signals poking out it'll look better too.
Earlier in the thread I talked about the swingarm. It'll get another set of tubes from the spring loop back to the axle plates on either side, and one from the spring loop forward to the pivot tube in the middle. I'm just leaving it until I pull the frame apart for final welding
I've thought about just deleting the kicker, and probably will. The starter looked good enough inside, and spun well, so it's probably reliable. Removing the kick mechanism probably saves almost as much weight as a starter delete, too.