I'm pretty sure they've both done this, but I question if this has been sanctioned by the parties or if it's actions by supporters within those parties. I would also be reluctant to label protests as harassment, no matter where it's coming from.J-Rod10 said:One party is actively encouraging its followers to harass the other party and its followers in public.
J-Rod10 said:I think we may have varying definitions of "civil."
An investigation dragged on for ages.
One party is actively encouraging its followers to harass the other party and its followers in public.
J-Rod10 said:I think we may have varying definitions of "civil."
An investigation dragged on for ages.
One party is actively encouraging its followers to harass the other party and its followers in public.
irk miller said:I'm pretty sure they've both done this, but I question if this has been sanctioned by the parties or if it's actions by supporters within those parties. I would also be reluctant to label protests as harassment, no matter where it's coming from.
J-Rod10 said:
J-Rod10 said:Do you read most of the links you post?
J-Rod10 said:This is "inciting violence" to the left? Maybe the left is softer than I thought.
J-Rod10 said:I believe the press, as a whole, bends and twists things to fit their agenda.
I believe they rush to make something front page news as quickly as possible, regardless of the validity of it so they can be the one to break it. If they're wrong, so what, they'll spend 15 seconds saying they were wrong next week.
Antifa, they're not fighting Nazi's. The current group who calls them self "antifa" are a bunch of thugs who mask their identity to go commit violent acts. They sucker punch people, and run away. Or, 4-5+ of them get a hold of one person and go to town.
Personally, I don't get why folks are still harping on the lock her up bit towards Hillary.
If it was a regular person that did what she did, they'd be locked up. "She didn't intend to commit a crime" was the word on that. Someone who falls asleep at the wheel and kills someone didn't intend to kill someone, but they're still going to catch a manslaughter charge. Ole girl that shot her boyfriend in a bulletproof vest for YouTube views didn't intend to kill him, but she's sure as shit headed to prison over it.
On another note, I have not, and will not delve into racist remarks. That's not me. That's now how I think.
As for Savor's remarks. Heckling someone is one thing. Harassing them is another, and is quite illegal.
J-Rod10 said:the left is softer than I thought.
J-Rod10 said:I believe the press, as a whole, bends and twists things to fit their agenda.
I believe they rush to make something front page news as quickly as possible, regardless of the validity of it so they can be the one to break it. If they're wrong, so what, they'll spend 15 seconds saying they were wrong next week.
Antifa, they're not fighting Nazi's. The current group who calls them self "antifa" are a bunch of thugs who mask their identity to go commit violent acts. They sucker punch people, and run away. Or, 4-5+ of them get a hold of one person and go to town.
Personally, I don't get why folks are still harping on the lock her up bit towards Hillary.
If it was a regular person that did what she did, they'd be locked up. "She didn't intend to commit a crime" was the word on that. Someone who falls asleep at the wheel and kills someone didn't intend to kill someone, but they're still going to catch a manslaughter charge. Ole girl that shot her boyfriend in a bulletproof vest for YouTube views didn't intend to kill him, but she's sure as shit headed to prison over it.
On another note, I have not, and will not delve into racist remarks. That's not me. That's now how I think.
As for Savor's remarks. Heckling someone is one thing. Harassing them is another, and is quite illegal.
teazer said:Are we still talking about the same DJT that Australian authorities refused to grant a casino license because of his links to organized crime? The one who claims that he alone has brought down insurance premiums while simultaneously trying to get rid of the ACA and coverage for existing conditions?
Yes a few protesting women made some noise at Kavanaugh hearings because he lied about his past and the majority party refused to release the majority of his documented work record. More importantly they made some noise because that same majority party rallied to support a white man of money and ridiculed the women who accused him of wrongdoing.
Do we think that their voices should not be heard? Do we think it's OK to protect men and to not protect women? That was not a court of law where evidence of wrongdoing had to be proven beyond reasonable doubt and of course he has a right to tell state his side of the story, but the hast which the majority party and administration rushed through the "investigation" and swearing in were disgusting partisan politics and nothing more.
And the way that DJT and his sycophant supporters claim that some sort of radical left wing socialist conspiracy is going to take away medicare and raise insurance rates and so on is just devoid of reality.
Much more important than all that noise though is that a Republican Congress and White House will absolutely slash all social programs if they retain control after November. Medicare, medicaid and Social Security plus food stamps and other support programs will be slashed to keep the deficit from exploding as it is doing after the tax cuts. And let us not forget that tariffs on imported goods are a direct and indirect tax on all Americans of any party affiliation. They amount to a broad based tax of around $25 billion on all consumers.
And what happened to all those good paying American jobs that are coming back? Well the tax breaks have largely paid for stock buy backs and the steel industry has raised prices but refuse to negotiate with unions over pay raises, so that's more money for industry owners and investors.
Sav0r said:J rod has money in the markets and is willing to ignore the social losses while he gains financially.
teazer said:One significant change on politics isn't that Trump is the first politician in history to lie or to embellish the truth.